Hopefully you guys like this one, it's definitely much scarier than my typical work, but I think that only helps in making this one stand out even more. I wanted his bloody tongue form, which is probably as close to his true form as he normally likes to get, to seem like it didn't really belong in this world and I think I got fairly close to that goal. Just to talk about making this picture a bit, I really wanted Nyarlathotep's true form to stand out from his human form, so that's why I went hard on the textures for him in his bloody tongue form while just doing my typical shading style for his human form. His demented imagination is the only thing stopping him and he isn't limited to three dimensions, either. These are only two of the many, MANY forms he can take and can make new ones at will. I also love the idea that, like a kid, he is fully in love with junk food and is often seen eating fast food whenever he is not tormenting humanity. He gets a slight kick out of watching his seeds of chaos spread and grow, watching the people panic and turn on each other is quite amusing, though he is also very quick to anger if anything makes his job of keeping his elders asleep harder. Umbra's Freakshow and Bizarreties universe that he is very much like a spoiled brat, treating humans' suffering like zapping ants with a magnifying glass. (As in, so far down the line that I can basically post him without spoiling anything.) Even though Nyarlathotep is very much a mysterious and terrifying figure, I like to imagine in the Mr. Just a bit of flavor text for the late-term villain of Mr. The minds and souls of those that dread its malignant existence shall feel the madness in its presence and the chaos in its wake." Though it is unknown where it disappeared to, the old adage still rings true in the minds of the initiated: "When the faceless evil returns from the void beyond, the stars will tremble and reality itself will unwind from its arrival. Meanwhile, just a short while before he showed up, some giant monstrosity crashed down from the sky off the shores of the same island, though it seemed to disappear almost as soon as it made its watery landing, leaving the people of Providence on edge of an unknown threat. The difference is very small, really just changing a function to a subroutine.Īs correctly comments, there is a larger risk of ABI incompatibility in calling a function vs calling a subroutine (similar to a void function).Pharrell Black is a mysterious person who seemed to just appear in the small town of Providence, Rhode Island and has been very elusive, though it seems that wherever he goes, strange things seem to happen. I do not have an answer why that is necessary right now. The author of CBLAS chose to implement a Fortran intermediate subroutine sdsdotsub. However, you probably could call the sdsdot function (in whichever language it is actually implemented) directly from C cblas_sdsdot. The very common reference implementation is written in Fortran, but it is not the fastest one. The functionality is in whatever BLAS implementation you install. Share your thoughts, experiences, and stories behind the art. Therefore the CBLAS does not actually contain the whole functionality. BLAS can be implemented in C or assembly, but the API is set to be Fortran. BLAS is defined using a reference Fortran implementation and a Fortran API. "What I wanna ask is actually why there is a need for a intermediate wrapper, why not write it in C?" serialman PySerial Manager : A Python package facilitating the use of PySerial. (More detailed in this question)Īn example could be as below, with the usage of "object-closing" context manager from PEP 343 examples, and a wrapper class with close method which calls native object's destructor: with statement (from PEP 343) on the other hand guarantees that if _enter_ method of the object succeeded, then _exit_ method will be called at the end of the statement, both in case of normal execution and in case of exception. So even if in most cases _del_ method of an object is being called by GC, it is not guaranteed. The try…finally statement and the with statement provide convenient ways to do this. Programs are strongly recommended to explicitly close such objects. It is understood that these resources are freed when the object is garbage-collected, but since garbage collection is not guaranteed to happen, such objects also provide an explicit way to release the external resource, usually a close() method. Hollywood was a dangerous place for up-and-coming young actresses in the late 1950s. Some objects contain references to “external” resources such as open files or windows. Bettmann/Getty Images Harvey Glatman, The Glamour Girl Slayer, in jail. An implementation is allowed to postpone garbage collection or omit it altogether. Objects are never explicitly destroyed however, when they become unreachable they may be garbage-collected.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |